Discussing UK law. Links: swarb.co.uk | law-index | Acts | Members Image galleries

Implied defamation?

Implied defamation?

Postby Hairyloon » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:48 pm

`If an assertion of fact is posted on t'internet alongside a picture of a person, it gives the impression that that person asserted that fact.
Is that impression enough to give rise to a claim of defamation?

Image

Obviously not in this example...
User avatar
Hairyloon
 
Posts: 10314
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:12 pm
Location: From there to here and here to there... Funny things are everywhere.

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby atticus » Thu Dec 21, 2017 2:56 pm

If I post a wise saying next to a picture of you, why do you regard that as defamatory, even if the juxtaposition does appear odd?
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20288
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby atticus » Thu Dec 21, 2017 3:19 pm

That said, defamation by insinuation is possible. Ask Sally Bercow.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20288
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby Hairyloon » Thu Dec 21, 2017 4:17 pm

atticus wrote:If I post a wise saying next to a picture of you, why do you regard that as defamatory, even if the juxtaposition does appear odd?


Wisdom is not always nice.
One might, for example, post some of Goebbels thoughts on lies next to almost any politician you care to mention.
Whether the inference is that they said it, believe it or act on it, could be considered defamatory.
User avatar
Hairyloon
 
Posts: 10314
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:12 pm
Location: From there to here and here to there... Funny things are everywhere.

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby dls » Sat Dec 23, 2017 5:34 am

Juxtaposition can certainly enough be enough. However the false association has to be between a person and defamatory material, and the context cannot (as in the positing posting) be self contradicting.
David Swarbrick (Admin) dswarb@gmail.com - 0795 457 9992
User avatar
dls
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12388
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:35 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby diy » Sat Dec 23, 2017 11:44 am

Dave Goreman did a show on how far you can go within the law. Took a picture of a member of the audience, got them to sign a release for £50 and the associated negative activity with the picture.
My suggestions are not legal advice
User avatar
diy
 
Posts: 2665
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: Implied defamation?

Postby atticus » Sat Dec 23, 2017 3:13 pm

Indeed, we lawyers always recommend our clients to obtain a release before they defame someone. At fifty quid a go, they are great value.

Why not buy one as a Christmas gift for that special person?
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20288
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W


Return to Torts - Negligence, Defamation and others

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron