Discussing UK law. Links: swarb.co.uk | law-index | Acts | Members Image galleries

Impact Assessments

For discussion of all matters relating to the UK's departure from the European Union

Impact Assessments

Postby atticus » Wed Dec 06, 2017 1:47 pm

All this row over whether the impact assessments exist is FAKE NEWS.

After all, any suggestion of a negative impact is the work of PROJECT FEAR. The Brexit Secretary is to be congratulated for not wasting our money on these unnecessary analyses.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20649
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby Hairyloon » Wed Dec 06, 2017 3:16 pm

atticus wrote:The Brexit Secretary is to be congratulated for not wasting our money on these unnecessary analyses.

Except that he quite clearly told the House that they had been done. This is a little more serious than "the dog ate my homework".

Can he be held in Contempt of Parliament for this and if not, why not?
User avatar
Hairyloon
 
Posts: 10556
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:12 pm
Location: From there to here and here to there... Funny things are everywhere.

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby Hairyloon » Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:47 pm

David Davis has been accused of misleading parliament after he claimed the government had not conducted impact assessments on the economic impact of Brexit - having previously suggested to it had.

Opposition MPs have demanded the Brexit secretary be held in contempt of parliament.


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/m ... 3bfc36d99e
User avatar
Hairyloon
 
Posts: 10556
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:12 pm
Location: From there to here and here to there... Funny things are everywhere.

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby Goldensyrup » Wed Dec 06, 2017 5:49 pm

David Davis at the select committee was like someone on a floating platoon. Off to the Tower with him.
Goldensyrup
 
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 11:52 pm

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby dls » Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:49 pm

Except that he quite clearly told the House that they had been done.


Except that he didn't. There is a difference between wat he said was being prepred fand what he is accused of not providing
David Swarbrick (Admin) dswarb@gmail.com - 0795 457 9992
User avatar
dls
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:35 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby atticus » Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:51 pm

David, please don't tell me that you buy that risible argument. What exactly do you say Davis was referring to that he said had been prepared "in excruciating detail".
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20649
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby dls » Thu Dec 07, 2017 1:59 pm

I have not examiined it in detail, save to listen to teh argument on the Daily Politics yesterday. There appeared to be a genuine difference. Producing something in excruciating detail need not be the same as a sector by sector analysis.
David Swarbrick (Admin) dswarb@gmail.com - 0795 457 9992
User avatar
dls
Site Admin
 
Posts: 12514
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:35 pm
Location: Brighouse, West Yorkshire

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby atticus » Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:06 pm

This BBC article has a timeline of what Davis has said. I have read better and more detailed dissections of Davis's comments elsewhere. He has been thoroughly skewered.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20649
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby atticus » Thu Dec 07, 2017 2:51 pm

User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 20649
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Impact Assessments

Postby Hairyloon » Thu Dec 07, 2017 8:34 pm

At least somebody has done some assessments...

http://www.parliament.uk/business/commi ... published/
User avatar
Hairyloon
 
Posts: 10556
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 3:12 pm
Location: From there to here and here to there... Funny things are everywhere.


Return to Brexit

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron