Discussing UK law. Links: swarb.co.uk | law-index | Acts | Members Image galleries

Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby atticus » Fri Aug 18, 2017 4:58 pm

The law operates on proof, not strong suspicion (however reasonably or unreasonably formed).
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19897
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby diy » Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:24 pm

Wasn't there a statistic, that more nikon cameras had be stolen than ever made? If that was true, then there are some fraudulent claims.. Proving which ones are fraud may be hard, doesn't change the fact that there must be some.
My suggestions are not legal advice
User avatar
diy
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby atticus » Fri Aug 18, 2017 5:38 pm

Was there?

Can a camera be stolen only once?
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19897
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby diy » Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:57 am

Is it theft when its not yours?

I had some bikes stolen a few weeks back. They are quite distinctive custom builds. easily recognised by me. I wonder if I saw them in the street, am I within my rights to walk up and take them even if the current possessor had in good faith purchased them from the thief. I think you could snatch a bike off someone before they realised what was going on.

Technically though, they belong to my insurance company now. Anyway I'm digressing from the PI thread...

I suspect many claims fall in to a category of highly suspicious. e.g. 5 occupants, other side alleges accident was deliberate etc..
My suggestions are not legal advice
User avatar
diy
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby atticus » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:34 am

Suspicious claims should be contested. This was dls's point.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19897
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby diy » Sun Aug 20, 2017 5:41 pm

What about the value of candles ?

A decent lawyer might advise a client to pay a possibly dodgy claim for economic reasons.
My suggestions are not legal advice
User avatar
diy
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 10:06 pm

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby atticus » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:41 pm

How many candles?
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19897
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Reduction in Damages for Whiplash

Postby atticus » Sun Aug 20, 2017 6:47 pm

Sure, I advise clients about the cost and potential benefit of certain courses of action; most of not all lawyers do. But you don't pay up based on a commercial decision and then claim it was fraud.

And I have sat down with a client that had regularly faced claims of questionable merit, and always settled because of the individual cost of fighting each case. The client had got a name for being a pushover. The decision was taken to fight the next one to the end. The next case was fought, successfully. That dried up the flow of cases.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19897
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Previous

Return to Personal Injury

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests