atticus wrote:oh dear. Someone else with no idea of the meaning of the word "evidence".
Suppose for a moment that he had not written that. Would you still have made those accusations? If so, on what evie?
You mean his alleged/quoted letter of resignation?
If so, and it was untrue, then I'd be expecting him to immediately be very vocal about its being incorrect. His silence, however, has been deafening - surprising about someone who can readily produce such a torrent of words, fully aware that his words would likely be placed in the public domain.
Over the years, I have known and met and talked in detail with a number of people who work or worked for the Foreign Office. With just 1 exception they were all a bunch of complete tossers.
The FO needs a massive cleanout and would likely function far better if the number of garden gnomes it employs were halved. The tiers of mindless, overblown bureaucracy within it are beyond belief.
