No edit rule

[3.14]

Yep. A disability does not make anyone immune to criticism.

[atticus]

As I said, alex's self-proclaimed victimhood does not justify him writing bollocks. It's still bollocks, and no amount of trying to turn attention on to others will change that.

[Russell]

Lol all this effort, I'm flattered.

If people would read back Attius became abusive for no reason what-so-ever. And Boo then via copy selective copy and paste, attempted to defend him. Attius has on many occasions acted towards my disability in a manner which would be classified as discriminatory in the workplace, I even started a thread to establish this. It's been going on for years, not just this thread.

[Hairyloon]

If people would read back Attius became abusive for no reason what-so-ever. And Boo then via copy selective copy and paste, attempted to defend him.

The think is, if you talk bollocks a lot, and piss people off a lot, then it can sometimes take next to nothing to cause them to snap and kick off at you. As in "the straw that broke the camel's back".

In fact reading back Attius I'm sure had edited his content

I suggest that the logs are probably more reliable than your memory.

[Russell]

Hairy towing the line again, you did actually grow a pair of balls a few posts back

And the definition of 'bollocks' can also be paraphrased as anything that goes against the 'liberal' ethos of the forum. Or in another words, an opinion.

And I've posted nothing at all, on any level within this thread that would be considered wrong. Attitus likes to start fights. And I don't actually rise to them anymore. That's why I've not responded to him.

[Smouldering Stoat]

Russell, behave yourself.