Michael Barrymore

[preacherman]

curious how Micheal Barrymore can sue police for arrest in 2007 when it is now 2016?

[atticus]

Is this your way of trying to find a way round your limitation act problems?

The timeline in this BBC article shows that the court action was issued within 6 years of the arrest.

[dls]

Moved because no administrative law question is involved at all

[preacherman]

Is this your way of trying to find a way round your limitation act problems?

The timeline in this BBC article shows that the court action was issued within 6 years of the arrest.

thanks atticus, no I was just curious. I don`t think i tried suing the police for wrongful arrest. I should have. I don`t know if I have any options available, six years have passed. At the time I slipped into odd thinking, I think!

I was arrested for issuing court papers. When I told the Judge dealing with them, that the defendants had conspired and had me arrested, He said to me, 'at least you know what they are up to' ( the police read me all of the statements) and because the court was almost attached to the police station, I thought the police were in some way trying to help me, and even working with the court. I suppose I was a bit simple about it all. As you know I was evicted by the police also, and since a judge said to me, ' you need to understand the police are denying being there on both occasions' I have changed my view regarding the police as 'trying to help me'..

its pretty abusive to be telling me while under arrest that they came down to my premises with an order that said I had to leave and that there not bent coppers, but later denying being there when they are sued for evicting me. as well as a load of other stuff. anyway. Merry Christmas Atticus.

[preacherman]

Moved because no administrative law question is involved at all

sorry about that. is it true defamation cases can only be started in a London court. A judge said it to me when dealing with a case of mine, I was surprised I though you could issue a claim for defamation in any high court.

[atticus]

Thank you preacher. I hope your sermon for Christmas Day is more coherent.

[preacherman]

Thank you preacher. I hope your sermon for Christmas Day is more coherent.

'But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually appraised'.




just messing (and taking a scripture out of context), yes sorry it was a bit of a ramble. its not always beneficial to think a loud and expect someone to get the full meaning. I suppose that is why Courts want Chronology, dates, times, etc etc

[atticus]

It does help the judge if he or she can understand what was going on #toplegaltipfromaprofessional

[Hairyloon]

At what point does a clear difficulty in stringing together a coherent sentence count as a disability for which a reasonable adjustment needs to be made?

[shootist]

It won't go anywhere. He doesn't have the bottle.