Smouldering Stoat wrote:I think you are being a little harsh; in retrospect it would have been better for the passengers to have intervened, but it's not always immediately obvious how great or immediate the risk is.
Harsh? What is it that you think I am suggesting?
I don't believe this film is of the tram that crashed, and if somebody did make such a video of that tram on that day, then I have little doubt that they will have no doubt that they could have prevented the accident and they can deal with their own conscience.
As for the other tram, AFAIK, there was no incident, so no damage: any negligence was inconsequential.
And there are systems which are supposed to intervene if the driver loses vigilance.
It appears that they do not work very well.
There are emergency brakes (it appears that trams have a brake which the driver cannot override, which very few trains do) but they have a big warning on them about fining people for improper use.
I'm interested to hear the argument that the driver falling asleep would be an improper use of the brakes.