Discussing UK law. Links: swarb.co.uk | law-index | Acts | Members Image galleries

Civil Litigation - the basics

Civil Litigation - the basics

Postby atticus » Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:25 am

I posted this on the previous version of this forum. I post it again, as I think it is of vital importance to those involved in civil litigation to understand what they need to do. It is too easy to lose sight of the wood for the trees!

In any litigation you need to know a few key things, principally the applicable law and therefore what you have to prove to win/what the other side can prove to stop you winning. In legal academic circles this is described as your case theory: a brief statement of what your case is and why you should win.

Put it another way. You need to know and be able to show:

(a) what the parties’ legal obligations are to each other (be it in respect of a contract, under common law or a statute etc) [what should have happened]

(b) what actually happened [the facts]

(c) how those facts compare to what should have happened.

(d) if (c) is a breach of obligation, what that means. What were the results of the breach of obligation? How are those consequences to be compensated for or remedied?

A good lawyer typically goes through a checklist of: Duty; Breach; Causation; and Damage - the fancy words for the process I have just described.

A good litigation lawyer will develop his case theory using the above steps. Everything is tested against that. Once he has a clear idea of these things, he or she can look at every document, witness statement etc critically and put them into one of 3 categories (with reasons):

1. good (for your case)

2. bad

3. irrelevant

There is a constant appraisal whether information or developments help the case or present a problem. If a problem, the case theory needs to be reassessed.

Not every litigation lawyer thinks with this clarity. Believe me, it helps!

This process should be applied to cases from the time the client first asks you to consider it, as you go about the process of obtaining information and researching the law. It feeds into the advice given to the client and the formulation of strategy and objectives. In settlement discussions and mediation it is essential to have a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the case. I use my mediation statement to address these points, and have in some cases found it useful to have prepared a briefing note for the mediator on a particular issue or aspect of the case.

Oh yes, one more thing. It’s all very well to be clear why you should win, but keep asking yourself why you will lose. In every case there are reasons why you may lose. If you can identify those areas of weakness you can adjust your strategy to address them.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19061
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Civil Litigation - the basics

Postby superbird440 » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:20 am

It's quite daunting being a self litigant and trying to work out which paperwork is relevant or not. Being confident of winning is one thing but a very good point you make, is what are the weakness's. Would I be right in thinking to look for case law where appeals have failed on why?
superbird440
 
Posts: 895
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:41 pm

Re: Civil Litigation - the basics

Postby atticus » Tue Nov 26, 2013 10:42 am

First of all, you need to get to grips with your case theory (see my first post). Understand that and you are on your way to having a test for relevance.

As to what may cause you to lose, you need to look for anything that may affect your case. Anything. Look at the case as a whole.
User avatar
atticus
 
Posts: 19061
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 2:27 pm
Location: E&W

Re: Civil Litigation - the basics

Postby TommyKnocker » Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:28 pm

Excellent post. I really must get out of the robing room and employment forum more often.
Improvise, Adapt and Overcome
TommyKnocker
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 9:31 pm
Location: Oxford

Re: Civil Litigation - the basics

Postby Slartibartfast » Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:09 pm

TommyKnocker wrote:Excellent post. I really must get out of the robing room and employment forum more often.


I recommend this button - takes you straight to what's hot, across the board -

active.PNG
active.PNG (6.71 KiB) Viewed 1054 times


Last bumped by atticus on Mon Jun 22, 2015 5:09 pm.
"Judicial tergiversation is not to be encouraged"
User avatar
Slartibartfast
 
Posts: 3745
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 5:06 pm


Return to Litigation Practice

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests