Page 2 of 2

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:17 pm
by yorkshirepudding
It's a possibility that my request was ignored because of a defect. I sent the original request to the company secretary to circulate. Should I have posted it to every single shareholder?

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:35 pm
by atticus
Do please read section 303 (link given earlier). The request is made to the directors.

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 5:58 pm
by yorkshirepudding
Okay. Understood. Obviously I made a mistake which explains why my request was ignored. I have just looked at 303. Would a request to one director be sufficient or should I send to each and everyone?

If they continue to ignore the request after 28 days, should I send out my notices to each and every shareholder directly?

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 7:19 pm
by yorkshirepudding
Found the answer on 310.

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:06 pm
by atticus
Section 310 does not apply to your request to the directors to call a meeting. It relates to the calling of the meeting.

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:00 am
by yorkshirepudding
303 is for sending the request to each director. Is it enough to send just one letter to all directors without naming them to the registered address of the company?

310 is for sending the notice to each shareholder. Is it enough to send just one letter to all shareholders without naming them via the CS for circulation? Again I don't know the names and addresses of all the shareholders.

Re: Time limit to have meeting

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 8:32 am
by atticus
It should be sufficient to give the company Secretary your request to the directors.

You are entitled to inspect the register of members. You may look at the most recent annual return (online at Companies House) but this may be out of date.