atticus wrote:You are failing to get your head around the question of who breached what obligation. As David and I see it, the director in question was appointed by shareholders.
that is what I am trying to ascertain. I am aware the director was appointed by the shareholders. As I see it:
any shareholder who expects the director to be appointed after failing to gain shareholder consent would be in breach; and
the board of the company had no obligation to follow the shareholders so by acting as it did put itself in breach of the contract it had signed.
atticus wrote:Your guys' lawyers will have fuller details, and are advising.
i know that, i'm just trying to ask the silly questions here to get a better understanding of the issues.